With the advent of genetic engineering, the gene pool of wild species is seen not as a repository of diversity that serves the evolutionary process, but as a crop improvement toolkit. The new understanding is that genes from any organism, including human genes, can be inserted into other organisms through genetic engineering. A single gene or a set of genes may be transferred to crops to increase their productivity, nutrition value, tolerance to drought or resistance to insects and pests. With the growth of biotechnology industry and the use of intellectual property rights (IPRs) to own and protect biological resources and knowledge, living organisms, including animals and plants, and their genes have become commodities. Patents on life and life processes are being granted on the assumption that genetic engineering produces new organisms which do not exist in nature and are therefore patentable. As a result, all living organisms and biological products are considered to be man-made and hence patentable. With patenting, farmers lose their freedom to use seeds from their crops to plant the next season. They become dependent on corporations that own the patents for obtaining seeds and are prevented from using their traditional knowledge. Biopiracy refers to the use of intellectual property systems to legitimize the exclusive ownership and control over biological resources and knowledge, which belong collectively to a community. The implication of genetic engineering is thus not only that seeds can be genetically modified, but that they can also be patented and owned as intellectual property. This transformation of seeds from being a common resource to a corporate monopoly is a threat to biodiversity as well as to the freedom of farmers. What does the author imply by "seeds from being a common resource to a corporate monopoly"?

With the advent of genetic engineering, the gene pool of wild species is seen not as a repository of diversity that serves the evolutionary process, but as a crop improvement toolkit. The new understanding is that genes from any organism, including human genes, can be inserted into other organisms through genetic engineering. A single gene or a set of genes may be transferred to crops to increase their productivity, nutrition value, tolerance to drought or resistance to insects and pests. With the growth of biotechnology industry and the use of intellectual property rights (IPRs) to own and protect biological resources and knowledge, living organisms, including animals and plants, and their genes have become commodities. Patents on life and life processes are being granted on the assumption that genetic engineering produces new organisms which do not exist in nature and are therefore patentable. As a result, all living organisms and biological products are considered to be man-made and hence patentable. With patenting, farmers lose their freedom to use seeds from their crops to plant the next season. They become dependent on corporations that own the patents for obtaining seeds and are prevented from using their traditional knowledge. Biopiracy refers to the use of intellectual property systems to legitimize the exclusive ownership and control over biological resources and knowledge, which belong collectively to a community. The implication of genetic engineering is thus not only that seeds can be genetically modified, but that they can also be patented and owned as intellectual property. This transformation of seeds from being a common resource to a corporate monopoly is a threat to biodiversity as well as to the freedom of farmers. What does the author imply by "seeds from being a common resource to a corporate monopoly"?