Policy makers and media have placed the blame for skyrocketing food prices on a variety of factors, including high fuel prices, bad weather in key food producing countries, and the diversion of land to non-food production. Increased emphasis, however, has been placed on a surge in demand for food from the most populous emerging economies. It seems highly probable that mass consumption in these countries could be well poised to create a food crisis. With reference to the above passage, the following assumptions have been made: 1. Oil producing countries are one of the reasons for high food prices. 2. If there is a food crisis in the world in the near future, it will be in the emerging economies. Which of the above statements is/are valid?
1 only
2 only
Both 1 and 2
Neither 1 nor 2
Statement 1 is incorrect. The passage only mentions that high fuel prices as the reason. It fails the negation test also as Oil prices can rise despite involvement of Oil producing countries. Moreover, there are other fuels besides oil. So, it is not a valid assumption. Statement 2 is incorrect as the passage premise is about general food price hike and we can't have a specific assumption about emerging economies which weakens the conclusion rather than support it. Hence, option (d) is correct answer.
For election to the Lok Sabha, a nomination paper can be filed by
Miscellaneous · Easy
In a month if the seventh day is three days earlier than Saturday,then the nineteenth day of the month will be a
Miscellaneous · Easy
Which among the following events happened earliest ?
Miscellaneous · Easy
An 80-litre solution of alcohol and water has 75% alcohol. How much water (in litres) must be added to bring down the concentration of alcohol to 60%?
Miscellaneous · Easy